Sensor-Based Classification of Post-Stroke Motor Impairment Using Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Scores

Auteurs

Pinheiro C, Abreu L, Figueiredo J, Cruz C, Cerqueira J, Santos CP

Les auteurs en lien sont membres de l'INS.

Résumé

This study aims to evaluate multiple feature sets composed of sensor-based biomarkers acquired during walking for the automated estimation of post-stroke motor impairment levels using Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment (FMA-LE)-derived classes. Sensor-based walking data from the open-source ARRA dataset were combined with data collected at the Hospital of Braga. Data from 32 post-stroke individuals (FMA-LE motor score: 24 ± 3) were included. A decision tree classifier was evaluated using stratified six-fold cross-validation across different feature sets, including: correlated with motor impairment levels versus full feature sets; spatiotemporal versus surface electromyographic (sEMG) features; inclusion of demographic variables; and the use of data augmentation. The best performance was achieved using correlated sEMG features combined with age, paretic side, and body mass, along with noise-based data augmentation, yielding a validation Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.85 ± 0.16 and a test MCC of 0.70. sEMG features provided improved classification performance compared to spatiotemporal features, and comparable results were obtained using a reduced subset of muscles. T

This study aims to evaluate multiple feature sets composed of sensor-based biomarkers acquired during walking for the automated estimation of post-stroke motor impairment levels using Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Assessment (FMA-LE)-derived classes. Sensor-based walking data from the open-source ARRA dataset were combined with data collected at the Hospital of Braga. Data from 32 post-stroke individuals (FMA-LE motor score: 24 ± 3) were included. A decision tree classifier was evaluated using stratified six-fold cross-validation across different feature sets, including: correlated with motor impairment levels versus full feature sets; spatiotemporal versus surface electromyographic (sEMG) features; inclusion of demographic variables; and the use of data augmentation. The best performance was achieved using correlated sEMG features combined with age, paretic side, and body mass, along with noise-based data augmentation, yielding a validation Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.85 ± 0.16 and a test MCC of 0.70. sEMG features provided improved classification performance compared to spatiotemporal features, and comparable results were obtained using a reduced subset of muscles. T

Lire l’article