- Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes/
- Publications/
- Delayed brain and spine migration of a retained <scp>SEEG</scp> electrode fragment: An unexpected complication/
Delayed brain and spine migration of a retained <scp>SEEG</scp> electrode fragment: An unexpected complication
Epileptic Disorders · 2026
Auteurs
Krouma M, Makhalova J, Toutain G, Pizzo F, Lagarde S, Lepine A, Bartolomei F, Scavarda D
Les auteurs en lien sont membres de l'INS.
Équipes
Résumé
Abstract Background Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a well‐established technique for localizing epileptogenic zones in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, including children. While considered safe, rare but serious complications can occur. Case Presentation We report the case of a girl with tuberous sclerosis complex and drug‐resistant epilepsy who underwent SEEG implantation as part of pre‐surgical evaluation. Electrode placement was uneventful. However, during SEEG monitoring, the signal was lost on two electrodes, raising suspicion of fracture. During explantation, these electrodes were not retrieved, as the distal ends were not visible. The removal of the remaining electrodes proceeded without complication. Nearly 3 years later, the patient developed progressive gait instability. Imaging revealed migration of one electrode fragment into the spinal canal at the L4–L5 level, in contact with the cauda equina, and another fragment into the left temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. The spinal fragment was successfully removed surgically without complication. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of brain and spinal migration of a retai
Abstract Background Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a well‐established technique for localizing epileptogenic zones in patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, including children. While considered safe, rare but serious complications can occur. Case Presentation We report the case of a girl with tuberous sclerosis complex and drug‐resistant epilepsy who underwent SEEG implantation as part of pre‐surgical evaluation. Electrode placement was uneventful. However, during SEEG monitoring, the signal was lost on two electrodes, raising suspicion of fracture. During explantation, these electrodes were not retrieved, as the distal ends were not visible. The removal of the remaining electrodes proceeded without complication. Nearly 3 years later, the patient developed progressive gait instability. Imaging revealed migration of one electrode fragment into the spinal canal at the L4–L5 level, in contact with the cauda equina, and another fragment into the left temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. The spinal fragment was successfully removed surgically without complication. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of brain and spinal migration of a retai